8/10/2023 0 Comments Open source video compressionAnd here we are today, with an absolutely pathetic amount of actual HEVC content available despite the billions of devices with hardware support. Some of them even thought they'd be successful with their blackmail tactics this time around (as if Youtube & others were ever going to pay per-view licensing fees when they don't even charge for content, lol). When HEVC came around, the patent holders had a "brilliant" idea instead of banding together and having clear licensing terms, they instead formed multiple smaller factions or even struck out on their own, and they all wanted to charge money from the various potential users of HEVC. Can't do that if there's an open-source alternative. VP8 forced the hand of the greedy patent holders who thought they'd be able to dangle the rising internet streaming industry by the ankles and shake them until money fell out of their pockets. We'd be watching Youtube in Ogg Theora or something ancient like that. H.264 wouldn't be universally used if Google didn't buy On2 and release VP8 as open-source and royalty-free. Video coding formats aren't legal entities, so they can't win or lose anything. It's going to be difficult to understand if you don't even know (or haven't defined) what adoption or even "winning" means, and who the winners and losers are. I don't understand the advantage of open source video codec. If h.265 licensing was cheap/trivial/non-existant, there wouldn't be any need desire for av1. This is why Google, as one of the largest, if not the largest streamer of content, gave VP9 over as the basis of AV1.ĪV1 has a chance of success because Netflix, Google, Vimeo.anyone that doesn't want to deal with and pay mpeg-la licensing for h.265 will be really interested in it. The world changed, and streaming is so core to it, they seem to think they'll be able to make everyone just eat it. H.265 is running into a the same problems h.264 had originally with regards to that, but there doesn't seem to be any indication that they are going to try and fix it. Heck, Firefox didn't even have _any_ h.264 support before Cisco stepped in and paid the mpeg-la for a global license to use h.264 in Firefox without further royalties. H.264 almost didn't happen because of insane licensing, before mpeg-la got it's act together when it realized that licensing was preventing adoption. Although the licensing costs do sort of trickle down to us. The advantage is particularly for the producers, specifically with regards to the licensing costs, which tend to land more heavily on them. You're thinking only of technical aspects, and you are on the consumer end of things. I still use it for video editing to this day, due to it's good compromise between quality, speed (at least with hardware encoding), and file size. I don't want this to sound like I hate HEVC or anything, because I really don't. The main point was that I had to go through the embarrassment of needing to re-submit my video because I used a different one than (what I presume to be) the default on most editing software, which worked just fine for everyone else. If I was, then I would have just played it in VLC. Yeah, I'm honestly not sure what kind of software they were using to play the video, but I wasn't the one in charge of the projector. This is just a you problem :) Latest VLC or MPC-HC plays both just fine for free. VP9 and HEVC decoders are widely available in both software and hardware forms. Besides, if I (and many others) had a choice right now, we'd be watching movies in theaters, which use jpeg2000 sequences, but I wouldn't consider jpeg2000 to be a standard format by any means. Although I watch lots of movies via Amazon, I'd still say that such content makes up only a small part of my total video consumption (unless you are counting by bandwidth). I think I should have clarified that I was talking about WEB video specifically. A few notable exceptions? You mean literally every single piece of premium (paid) 4K / UHD content out there? Everyone uses HEVC for that today.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |